15.05

Site Map   

 
Javascript DHTML Drop Down Menu Powered by dhtml-menu-builder.com aa

Return on Investment

The investor/owner of a ground-mounted or roof-mounted solar array ( or any kind of Renewable Energy generation equipment ) is primarily interested in maximizing the return on the cost of equipment and labour which went into the building of that asset.  The key factor is the relationship between cost and return, and there are two ways to make any investment as profitable as possible :

  1. reduce the Capital Expenditure ( by building as cheaply as possible )

  2. increase the earnings ( by building the equipment to operate as efficiently as possible )

Choosing which method to use depends on how the asset earns money .


A: Payment for " assets in being "

Some jurisdictions pay a grant or subsidy just because the asset exists ( whether or not it produces any significant electricity ).  If you are in such a jurisdiction, then by all means, find the supplier that gives you the lowest ' dollars per watt ' which will reduce the CapEx. Just as a caution, be aware that the 'low first cost' vendors may not be particularly interested in protecting your expensive roof suface .( see sections 4 & 5 of this page. )


B: Payment for electricty produced

Other jurisdictions pay ( via a Power Purchase Agreement or Feed In Tarrif ) for the electricity actually generated and provided to the grid.

In those jurisdictions ( for example, Ontario ) you definitely want to have a system that generates the most electricity and thus the most revenue.  The true metric of a solar array is thus " dollars revenue per year " or " dollars of cost per KiloWattHour produced " That is, the total cost of the system over 20 ( or 40 ) years divided by the total KiloWattHours generated over that same time. .

Let's examine the factors that lead to higher production and thus higher revenue :
 " Low first cost " vendorsHybridyne
PV panels usedcheaper panels usually don't deliver their 'nameplate' ratings - less outputhigh quality panels deliver as rated - higher output
"cheaper panels usually don't produce well in less than perfect light  - less yield per day/yearhigh quality panels deliver more electricity per day
"cheaper panels usually don't last as long - decreasing output and increasing maintenancehigh quality panels last longer and yield more over the lifetime
Electronicslow cost 'inverters' don't maximize yield - less electricity per dayour CIT technology delivers about 30% more electricity per year
"low cost 'inverters' don't last - replacing them after 5-10 years is expensiveHybridyne CIT electronics will last more than 20 years
Mounting angletypically low angles, reducing productionangled to maximize yield
"panels mounted at too shallow an angle will collect snow and ice, decreasing yieldangled to allow snow to slide off - keeping yield high all year
Mounting methodballasted systems will need to be removed for roof repair, decreasing revenue at those timesour mouting methods allow roof maintenance without removal
"improper mouting systems will damage your roof membrane - repairs are expensiveour mouting methods don't touch the roof surface - no leaks